- Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF) ($1.2 trillion)
- Federation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Associations (KKR) ($78 billion),
- Pension Fund Association For Local Government Officials ($175 billion)
- The Promotion And Mutual Aid Corporation For Private Schools Of Japan ($36 billion)
- Other 100 public institutions
- 86 national universities.
The below are some of the recommendations the panel made in the report.
- The public funds should review the current portfolio allocation that is heavily biased towards domestic bonds.
- The public funds should review their investment return targets and risk tolerance levels.
- For increased portfolio diversification, the public funds should consider investing in new asset classes, such as REITs / real estate, infrastructure, venture capital, private equity and commodity.
- The public funds should consider increasing allocations to active management funds. Establishment of a "baby fund" (an internal segregated account) may be considered for more flexible deployment of capital.
- The public funds should review appropriate benchmarks for passive investments. For Japanese equity, new benchmarks, such as JPX Nikkei 400 that focuses on constituent stocks' ROE, may be considered.
- Ministries overseeing the public funds should duly entertain the initiatives of each fund management institution.
- It is desirable that key investment decisions are made collectively by investment experts who work on a full-time basis and who are free of conflict.
- To invest in new asset classes and to have robust risk management capability, it is necessary that the public funds are amply resourced and staffed with top-class professionals. To this end, the HR and expense restrictions imposed by past cabinet decisions should be relaxed.
- GPIF should be reorganized under a new law that specifically caters to its unique status. GPIF should be given a higher degree of independence and authority on the condition that it maintains a high level of transparency and accountability. The change should enable key decisions be made by its board, whose member would be conflict-free investment experts. As an interim measure under the existing governing law, transferring/delegating investment decision making authority from the CEO to an investment committee made up of conflict free investment professionals should be considered.
- "Forward looking" risk management should be introduced and attentions should be paid to inflation risks. Investing in inflation-linked JGBs and use of derivatives should be contemplated for risk mitigation.
- The public funds should consider more active use of shareholder rights, despite their public nature, in order to maximize investment returns.
- GPIF should immediately work on the followings:
guidelines, increasing allocations to active funds
- Review of risk/return target
- Review of benchmarks for passive investments
- Application of forward-looking risk management,
inflation risk hedging
- Review of benchmarks for passive investments
- Application of forward-looking risk management,
inflation risk hedging
GPIF should work on the followings in the next 12 months:
- Revision of base portfolio allocation
- Introduction of new asset classes
(mainly those with liquidity and NAV transparency)
- Establishment of a baby fund
- Employment of full-time committee members and investment
professionals with significant expertise
- Revision of base portfolio allocation
- Introduction of new asset classes
(mainly those with liquidity and NAV transparency)
- Establishment of a baby fund
- Employment of full-time committee members and investment
professionals with significant expertise
GPIF should work on the followings with necessary
legislative changes.
- Introduction of new asset classes
(with lower liquidity and lower NAV transparency)
- establishment of fully-empowered board
legislative changes.
- Introduction of new asset classes
(with lower liquidity and lower NAV transparency)
- establishment of fully-empowered board